Tulane The Robert T Stafford Disaster Relief & Emergency Assistance Act HW

by | Mar 19, 2024 | Uncategorized

Question Description

+PLEASE VIEW THE ATTACHED POWERPOINT SLIDES 8-16 FOR HOW TO CONDUCT A POLICY ANALYSIS. THE INTENDED POLICY FOR ANALYSIS IS THE POLICY INDICATED IN THE QUESTION TOPIC ABOVE. PLEASE FOLLOW THE WRITING PROMPT, POWERPOINT, AND RUBRIC. THANK YOU :)!

Select a policy–either within the United States or Internationally–that addresses preparation or responses to disasters. Complete a detailed policy analysis, addressing the following:

  1. Write an assessment of the policy analysis or proposal and the need it addresses
  2. Provide a description of the policy, including historical background and an explanation of the context where the policy is enacted as it relates to the disaster management cycle
  3. Provide a rationale for the policy
    • Provide an explanation of how the policy supports the goals of the community
    • Describe the main components of the policy and how the components address the problem and the stage of the disaster management cycle. Specify any specific tools or resources used (e.g., economic or funding mechanisms)
  4. Explain how the policy intends to achieve its goals to demonstrate its effectiveness
  5. Explain how the policy addresses issues of diversity or areas where diversity is lacking; in particular, what are the underlying social and political values the policy adheres to?
  6. Detail any issues and challenges in implementation
  7. Describe the policy’s plan for evaluating the policy, or offering specified policy alternatives

Alternatively, if there is not a policy that is already in existence that interests you, you may suggest the implementation of a new policy, using the critical elements specified.

Your assignment should be 12 to 15 double-spaced pages in length. Please include appropriate scholarly references and a title page. Assignment should be free of grammatical errors and all references should be cited in APA format.

SOWK 7075 – Session 14 – Final Paper

SOWK 7075 – Session 14 – Final Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment
47.0 ptsExcellent

Writes a cogent and sophisticated assessment of the client’s mental health status, policy analysis, or program proposal and the need it addresses

 35.0 ptsSatisfactory

Writes a brief assessment of the client’s mental health status, policy analysis, or program proposal and the need it addresses

 30.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Writes a brief assessment of the client’s mental health status, policy analysis, or program proposal and the need it addresses, but assessment lacks detail or contains inaccuracies

 0.0 ptsNot Evident

Does not write a brief assessment of the client’s mental health status, policy analysis, or program proposal
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContext and Background
47.0 ptsExcellent

Provides a sophisticated explanation of the context of the treatment, policy, or program as it relates to the disaster management cycle, including relevant historical background

 35.0 ptsSatisfactory

Describes the context of the treatment, policy, or program as it relates to the disaster management cycle, including relevant historical background

 30.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Describes the context of the treatment, policy, or program as it relates to the disaster management cycle, including relevant historical background, but description lacks detail or contains inaccuracies

 0.0 ptsNot Evident

Does not describe the context of the treatment, policy, or program
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRationale
47.0 ptsExcellent

Provides sophisticated rationale for the treatment, policy, or program. Provides a sophisticated explanation of how the intervention, policy, or program supports the goals of the individual community. Provides in-depth explanation of the main components of the intervention, policy, or treatment and how they address the disaster cycle. Tools or resources used are appropriate in supporting the intervention, policy, or program.

 35.0 ptsSatisfactory

Provides rationale for the treatment, policy, or program.; Provides an explanation of how the intervention, policy, or program supports the goals of the individual community. Describes the main components of the intervention, policy, or treatment and how they address the disaster cycle. Specify tools or resources used.

 30.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Provides rationale for the treatment, policy, or program, but rationale does not address the disaster cycle, lacks detail, or contains inaccuracies

 0.0 ptsNot Evident

Does not provide rationale for the treatment, policy, or program
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEffectiveness
47.0 ptsExcellent

Provides an insightful explanation for how the treatment, policy or program demonstrates its effectivenes

 35.0 ptsSatisfactory

Explains how the treatment, policy or program demonstrates its effectiveness

 30.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Explains how the treatment, policy or program demonstrates its effectiveness, but explanation lacks detail or contains inaccuracies

 0.0 ptsNot Evident

Does not explain how the treatment, policy, or program demonstrates its effectiveness
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiversity
47.0 ptsExcellent

Provides an insightful and thoughtful explanation for how the treatment, policy, or program addresses or fails to address issues of diversity

 35.0 ptsSatisfactory

Explains how the treatment, policy, or program addresses or fails to address issues of diversity

 30.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Explains how the treatment, policy, or program addresses or fails to address issues of diversity, but explanation lacks detail or contains inaccuracies

 0.0 ptsNot Evident

Does not explain how the treatment, policy, or program addresses or fails to address issues of diversity
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeChallenges
47.0 ptsExcellent

Offers a sophisticated explanation of any issues and challenges faced in implementation

 35.0 ptsSatisfactory

Details any issues and challenges in implementation

 30.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Details any issues and challenges in implementation, but description is incomplete or contains inaccuracies

 0.0 ptsNot Evident

Does not detail any issues and challenges in implementation
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation
47.0 ptsExcellent

Provides a cogent explanation of the plan for evaluating the treatment, policy, or program, and how it may be improved

 35.0 ptsSatisfactory

Describes the plan for evaluating the treatment, policy, or program, and how it may be improved

 30.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Describes the plan for evaluating the treatment, policy, or program, but description lacks detail or contains inaccuracies

 0.0 ptsNot Evident

Does not describe the plan for evaluating the treatment, policy, or program
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
21.0 ptsExcellent

References appropriate scholarly work to provide justification for treatment plan. Assignment is free of grammatical errors and all references are cited in APA format.

 15.0 ptsSatisfactory

References appropriate scholarly work to provide justification for treatment plan. Assignment is free of grammatical errors and all references are cited in APA format.

 10.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

References appropriate scholarly work to provide justification for treatment plan. Minor grammatical errors. Some references are not cited in APA format.

 0.0 ptsNot Evident

Does not reference scholarly work to provide justification for treatment plan. Major grammatical errors.
21.0 pts
Total Points: 350.0

 
<

Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A

Order Solution Now